6 reports on this story
Study behind proposed water cost increases didn't examine existing revenue
What happened
Utah lawmakers considered a bill to raise water rates for infrastructure funding, but the study supporting the proposal did not account for existing water provider revenues, leading to criticism about the accuracy of the financial claims.
Timeline
- KSL Study behind proposed water cost increases didn't examine existing revenue
- KSL News (YouTube) Utah’s Water Infrastructure: Do Taxpayers Have the Full Picture?
- KSL News (YouTube) Study behind proposed water cost increases didn't examine existing revenue
- KSL's Inside Sources Utah's Water Infrastructure: Do taxpayers have the full picture?
- KSL News (YouTube) Utah's Water Infrastructure: Do taxpayers have the full picture?
- KSL News (YouTube) Study behind proposed water cost increases didn't examine existing revenue
Written by Utah Relay from the reports below. The reporting belongs to the outlets named; follow the links for their full stories.
Every report
Utah’s Water Infrastructure: Do Taxpayers Have the Full Picture?
— The article reports on a new report by the Utah Rivers Council challenging a state study on Utah's water infrastructure, alleging it omits relevant data. It also mentions rising diesel costs affecting school districts…
Study behind proposed water cost increases didn't examine existing revenue
— A study supporting proposed water cost increases in Utah did not examine existing revenue sources, raising concerns about the financial implications for consumers and the potential impact on water infrastructure funding.
Utah's Water Infrastructure: Do taxpayers have the full picture?
— The article reports that the Utah Rivers Council is criticizing the state for asking Utahns to pay more for water without fully justifying the need or explaining why existing revenue cannot be used for future projects…
Utah's Water Infrastructure: Do taxpayers have the full picture?
— The article reports that the Utah Rivers Council is criticizing the state for asking Utahns to pay more for water without fully justifying the need or explaining why existing revenue cannot be used for future projects…